« Developer of retail center wants Starbucks, not independent coffee shop | Main | Starbucks customer sues over spilled coffee »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515c0a69e200d8342da31e53ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Will Starbucks be flattered -- or ready to call its lawyers when it sees this ad?:
» clerk county court fl orange orlando from clerk county court fl orange orlando
company in liability limited virginia
world cricket match
mesothelioma lawyer massachusetts
[Read More]
» tall grande venti 33.8 Bolt from Acceptable Downtime
I picked up a bottle of Bolthouse Farms Perfectly Protein Mocha Cappuccino from Whole Foods this morning and drank just about the whole thing in a few sips and was then completely wired for the next several hours. Not sure... [Read More]
» Bolthouse Farms Mochachino from Acceptable Downtime
I picked up a bottle of Bolthouse Farms Perfectly Protein Mocha Cappuccino from Whole Foods this morning and drank just about the whole thing in a few sips and was then completely wired for the next several hours. (ed note... [Read More]
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
it wont get launched. Venti is italian for twenty, and twenty does not accurately describe a burrito.
Posted by: andrew h | July 17, 2006 at 11:28 AM
I'd imagine that they can use the "tall" and "grande" all they want, but "venti" is a registered trade mark.. sooo I'm betting on "call their lawyers"
Posted by: | July 17, 2006 at 11:30 AM
Well, its obvious they are refering to Starbucks lingo because thats the first thing that any breathing person would think of. It could be launched and I bet lawers have already been called and I bet they even ok'ed it. Why not! The first thing you think of is Starbucks not burrito shingding.
Posted by: James the Barista | July 17, 2006 at 11:44 AM
My first thought: "What is Starbucks selling that's wrapped in foil?" No matter what the lawyers say, it doesn't seem like it'll have the impact they want for the burrito joint.
Posted by: Just Me | July 17, 2006 at 11:55 AM
It's been on a billboard on the Eisenhower expressway in Chicago for a couple of weeks now.
But to twist this a bit, what would the reaction be to ingredient-based pricing at Starbucks instead of size-based pricing? Ex: all Mochas are the same price, regardless of size. Essentially, you customize your drink like you do your burrito at Chipotle.
Posted by: CD | July 17, 2006 at 11:57 AM
You do already customize your drink any way you like at starbucks....
Posted by: coffeeguy :) | July 17, 2006 at 01:30 PM
..while they are at it, maybe they will sue other coffee shops that use the terms "tall", "grande", and "venti".
Maybe even sue over the term "barista."
I think it would be a waste of time and effort on Starbucks' part -- at least it seems they could be spending that time and money on other areas.
It's their deal though.
Posted by: Jason | July 17, 2006 at 03:12 PM
I'll just sue Chipotle's when they refuse to accept my Starbucks card for payment. Since "obviously" they must have a tie-in with them...
Posted by: jafc | July 17, 2006 at 04:11 PM
The ad's not new. I've seen it in Chipotle stores before (6 months ago at least).
Posted by: Jim | July 17, 2006 at 04:17 PM
jason: it's not stupid, it's copyright law.
well, let me restate that: copyright law is stupid, not starbucks.
the way it works is you have to protect it, or you lose it...as in: it isn't trademarked anymore.
and: what other coffee shop uses the tall, grande and venti??
none that i know of, and none would be allowed too, i think...
(see note above about copyright laws)
Posted by: nickname | July 17, 2006 at 06:15 PM
I say Sue the bastards. Their carnitas suck, but it's the only fast food place you can get them, so they are known for them. I'd sue them just for that.
Posted by: JustABarista | July 17, 2006 at 06:49 PM
The Starbucks vs. McDonalds feud continues! For those of you who aren't familiar, Chipotle is a chain of restaurants owned by McDonalds. Chipotles for the most part have a great atmosphere and feature music much like Starbucks' Hear Music programming.
So, it kind of began when McDonalds started offering "Premium Coffee" beverages to their customers, putting McDonalds at a more "cafe" status. Burger King and others have tried to follow suit, but it was obviously in response to the popularity of Starbucks.
Then, Starbucks gave McDonalds the finger with the still-fast-spreading "warming stores" featuring Egg McMuffin-style breakfast sandwiches. And now this advertising.
What's next? Starbucks' move.
Posted by: John Molina | July 17, 2006 at 07:00 PM
Lawsuits. :)
Posted by: coffeeguy :) | July 17, 2006 at 07:21 PM
I think Chipotle will be protected under parody exemptions. They aren't really calling their burritos by those names, nor are they actually inferring their burritos are different sizes. In fact, the point is they aren't.
Posted by: Deusx | July 17, 2006 at 09:07 PM
That has got to be the most stupid ad I have ever seen for a food restaurant.
And Starbucks would never sue over the term "barista" so that joke is just about old.
Posted by: seattle | July 17, 2006 at 09:38 PM
They have the ad painted on a building in here in downtown Portland. All it did was make me think of Starbucks, and how i wanted to go to starbucks, not eat a burrito. I think the ad will benefit Starbucks more than Chipotle Mexican Grill, and Starbucks didn't even have to spend money on it.
Posted by: sbuxboy | July 17, 2006 at 11:22 PM
The ad says to me: "Chipotle charges three different prices for the same burrito." And didn't McD's upgrade their cofee to Seattle's Best Coffee, a brand owned by SBUX?
Posted by: this space for rent | July 17, 2006 at 11:34 PM
Yep=)
Posted by: Deusx | July 17, 2006 at 11:37 PM
lets not forget venti is 20 in italian.'
can you sue for translation?
Posted by: Dima | July 18, 2006 at 12:24 AM
As Jim already said, this is an OLD ad. If Starbucks hasn't sued by now, they probably won't. And Chipotle is probably protected under fair use/satire on this one anyway.
Posted by: Lyra | July 18, 2006 at 12:45 AM
I doubt "venti" is going to be the source of a lawsuit. They can probably trademark (and that's potentially what is going on here trademark, not copyright, infringment.) Perhaps the 20 refers to the weight of the burrito? If not ounces, perhaps some other unit of measurement. I sure wish Chipotle would have different size burritos! I now live where there is no Chipotle, I miss Chipotle.
Posted by: Tony | July 18, 2006 at 05:24 AM
Is the Starbucks site down? I have not been able to access for 2 days.
Posted by: BigT | July 18, 2006 at 08:16 AM
So, who should sue when other restaurants use "small, medium, and large" since that had to start in one place as well.
Posted by: purplejbaker | July 18, 2006 at 09:21 AM
yeah considering small medium and large are also clothing sizes and the sizes of pretty much everything else in the world, I don't think they will sue because I don't think that started in a restaurant.
Posted by: | July 18, 2006 at 11:17 AM
If anyone out there thinks Starbucks ISN'T going to sue, I've got 3 words for you:
"Collapse Into Cool."
Hard-core employees will know what I'm talkin about
Posted by: Sheik | July 18, 2006 at 11:40 AM
"Collapse Into Cool."
Ahhhh the memories.... call me insensitive, but some people are waaaaaayyy to reactionary.
Posted by: | July 18, 2006 at 03:25 PM
"If anyone out there thinks Starbucks ISN'T going to sue..."
Well, Sheik, the biggest argument for Starbucks not sueing seems to be the fact that this ad campaign is really old, and if Starbucks was going to sue, they would have done it already.
And thanks for trying to be cryptic and "in" by vaguely referencing the past hoping someone will ask. It's classy and informative.
Posted by: Lyra | July 18, 2006 at 04:43 PM
Wait, McDonald's serves Seattle's Best? Very interesting. Quite a fun game corporations play, don't you all think so?
Posted by: John Molina | July 18, 2006 at 06:33 PM
Maybe both? ;-)
Posted by: Chris Meisenzahl | July 19, 2006 at 06:09 AM
Chipotle is no longer owned by McDonalds, FYI.
Posted by: Rae | July 19, 2006 at 06:54 AM
I can't keep up with this game, apparently. So who owns Chipotle, nowadays?
Posted by: John Molina | July 19, 2006 at 06:06 PM
Well, Wikipedia explained it to me. At one point, McDonald's owned 90% of Chipotle.
"Since 1997, the McDonald's Corporation has owned a majority interest in Chipotle, but on April 26, 2006, McDonald's, which at that time owned a 69% interest in the company, announced that it would be divesting its remaining interest by the end of the year." (wikipedia:chipotle mexican grill)
Just thought I'd let y'all in on the infos.
Posted by: John Molina | July 19, 2006 at 06:27 PM
Any publicity is good publicity.
if a person is savvy enough to pick up on the reference it will only remind them to stop for their frappucino after dinner
to chipotle i say good luck and godspeed- - if this is of serious concern to us guys then we really need to reconsider the battles we are fighting :) Chipotle is a taco stand, we're purveyors of gourmet coffees and espresso based beverages...right?
Posted by: ILBARISTA | July 19, 2006 at 10:58 PM
chipotle is essentially the starbucks of mexican food anyways
Posted by: | July 25, 2006 at 10:01 PM
I find the fact that people are arguing about Chipotle's vs. Starbucks to be hilarious. We have plenty of cafés and mexican restaurants here that are better than either. Can't beat Cafe Kopi, or La Bamba's. You can keep your big corporate crap.
Posted by: Ghod | July 26, 2006 at 01:11 PM
As DeusX mentioned, they're making a joke out of the fact that Tall, Grande, and Venti, are about as descriptive as big, big, and big.
Oh, Ghod, I'd love to try Cafe Kopi and La Bamba's, but they're not where I am. Chipotle and Starbucks aren't corporate crap, they're corporate pretty-good. Frankly, the coffee that most Americans drank before the mid 80's tasted like complete ass. Your Cafe Kopi owes part of its success to the fact that Starbucks introduced America to "gourmet" coffee.
Posted by: Valkor | July 28, 2006 at 04:12 PM
Here in Berlin we have several other coffee shops (all very much looking like Starbucks albeit being better and cheaper) and they also use "venti", and also "frappucino" by the way. I never knew that those words were trademarked by Starbucks and wonder why they do not enforce that. Sure enough: all those litte "TM" and "R" signs on the menu look rediculous.
Posted by: Dominik | August 01, 2006 at 06:14 AM
They'll have to sue just about every other coffee shop in Seattle. Venti in Italian is 20 (for 20 oz.) that could accurately describe a burrito, which would be about 1.25 pounds.
Posted by: Larry Davenport | August 09, 2006 at 01:52 PM
i think this ad is hilarious because it makes fun of the ridiculous sizing that starbucks offers and says that chipotle doesn't really offer sizes. their burritos are all huge/venti.
i laugh everytime i see it in chicago.
Posted by: john | August 22, 2006 at 02:01 PM
Ghod, you're from Champaign (or Urbana), huh? I used to live there, and agree TEN MILLION FOLD that Cafe Kopi and La Bamba are a zillion times better than Starbucks or Chipotle. In fact, those are two of the very few things that I miss about Champaign...
Posted by: wow - from champaign?! | August 22, 2006 at 10:22 PM