« Overheard: "They're not doing snapshots; they're now doing Customer Voices" | Main | "Once Starbucks is in, there are others soon to follow" »

September 26, 2006

Coffee retailer accuses Starbucks of having an "insatiable and unchecked ambition"

Penny Stafford, owner of Belvi Coffee and Tea Exchange, says she was locked out of the best office space in Bellevue and Seattle by Starbucks' exclusive leasing agreements with landlords. She finally rented space to sell espresso inside a deli, but says her customers were inundated with free samples from Starbucks employees who worked nearby. She's put out a press release announcing her lawsuit. (Read the story at seattletimes.com | Earlier post about Stafford's complaint)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515c0a69e200d834eb457069e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Coffee retailer accuses Starbucks of having an "insatiable and unchecked ambition":

Comments

What I'm unclear on is whether or not the Starbucks sample bearers actually entered the premises of her establishment, bearing samples. If so, then she has a case--but perhaps not in the way it's currently being stated.

Starbucks has been guilty of bad taste in its actions, but that's not prosecutable. :)

Yeah, I'm not sure that having "insatiable and unchecked ambition" is anything illegal.

"It is clear to us that Starbucks' game plan is to completely dominate a market by forcing out competition, something they've done quite well in the Seattle area," Berman added. "We also believe that this scorched-earth approach is happening in many other major markets across the U.S." Berman, Stafford's lawyer: Seattle Times

Did mention there are around 180 independant coffee shops listed in the phonebook for the Seattle metro area? That's not counting street vendors, etc.

"That's not counting street vendors, etc."

Where are there street vendors in the Seattle metro? And no, there aren't 180 shops. More like 80.

Is the MSN Money article still a live link? It has more info than the PI. I can post the whole article if it's dead.

What thread was that in Dave? I can't find our posts.

Try this. Tell me if it doesn't work. I have a copy and will post the article.

http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/article.asp?Feed=PR&Date=20060925&ID=6050590&Symbol=US:SBUX

dave, it works for me.

This woman's nuts....She wants to start her own espresso company in the hometown of the world's largest espresso corporation? Then she complains about all the Starbucks she works near. It's comparable to a homeowner moving in next to the airport and then complaining about all the noise.

I wonder if the whole thing is a set-up just to be able file a lawsuit (much more lucrative than selling bad coffee).

She's complaining about a company paying rent at a place like a strip mall and securing a non-compete clause. That happens all the time. Other coffee companies do the same. The only place you generally don't get those is in a indoor malls.

Whiner, at a Mall here we have a SBUX kiosk across from a Gloria Jeans Beans and a Panera the next floor up. You can see all 3 at once standing at the kiosk. Each store offers something different and appeals to its own type of customer, no one has a taste quite like SBUX and not everyone likes it. Seems to me Belvi Coffee and Tea Exchange didn't offer anything people wanted.

Wow...bitter much.

Maybe the customers didn't agree with your quality?

"Maybe the customers didn't agree with your quality?"

Seriously.

And I seriously doubt that there was any malicious sampling.

Welcome to the Litigious States of America.

I just love the phrase "malicious sampling."

I can see me now, tray of pumpkin spice in my hand, "bwa ha ha ha, I'm evil, and doing this to be evil and further my evil intent and plans!"

The company is smart enough not to do anything unlawful. And clauses written into leases are NOTHING new. Maybe she should just do what Shultzie did and offer to buy the company and radically change it (of course she'd have to have dynamic business strategies, vision, and live with being in debt for a while).

Look, business is business and just because it's JUST starting to make news for some of these things does not mean their new. Try business practices at the turn of the century (20th, not 21st). Perhaps we should just change the laws instead of punish companies.

That ambition is what causes progress, better products w/ lower cost, and happier customers.

Chris
http://amateureconblog.blogspot.com/

You are all being paid by Starbucks!!!!

AHHHHHHHHH!

That press release is bizarre, histrionic and somewhat embarassing.

"Starbucks frequently offers to make lease payments higher than fair market value in exchange for a property owner's agreement to prevent competitors from leasing space in the same building..."

Oh no, they demand to be the sole cafe in a building and make it worth the landlord's while! Those fiends!

The exclusivity clause in lease agreements is hardly a Starbucks invention. I'll bet the courthouse cafeteria wherever this case is heard has a similar clause in their lease.

"they continually sent employees loaded with free drink samples to stand in front of my shop"

I call BS on this claim and can't wait for her to go more in-depth on this. I want to know where she's defining "in front of my shop" because if Starbucks didn't have a leased presence on the property, then they were trespassing. I don't think even Starbucks is stupid enough to do that.

"Starbucks uses its huge financial power to purchase other independent providers in an effort to squash any presence of independent coffee purveyors."

This isn't the best quote, but the hysteria in the paragraphs surrounding it honestly made it hard to choose a good sample.

I'm sure it will come as a great shock to Seattle cafes like Victrola, Pegasus, Fremont Coffee, Online Coffee, Cherry Street and so forth that they're being squeezed out of the market by Starbucks. Sort of odd that all these places have diehard customer bases and this person couldn't cultivate the same. Wonder why?

Perhaps Penny Stafford didn't do proper research into opening a foodservice business, lost a lot of money and just wants a scapegoat? Wouldn't be the first time an amateur got in over their heads in this kind of enterprise.

I hate starbucks coffee.. their specialty coffees are a dietitian's nightmare, their regular coffee must have chemical additives and the beans are hyper-over-roasted. everything costs $5. what trash

no I am not paid by sbux just go there as matter of good choice

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Sponsored Ad (2)

Ads (1)

Search Site

Ads (2)

Sponsored Ads