By January 3, all of the bakery and fresh lunch items at half of Starbucks’ nearly 6,000 U.S. stores will contain zero grams of trans fat. Each week since mid-December, Starbucks has been quietly swapping out other items containing trans fat in Chicago and other cities. A company rep says customers haven’t seemed to notice. "We haven't gotten any negative feedback," she says. "I've tasted them and I couldn’t tell the difference." (Crain's Chicago Business | Chicago Tribune)
WASHINGTON DC is going trans-fat free, baby. I saw the memo on my SM's desk. Well ... I am in Northern Virginia. So it might be starting out here. But it's still AWESOME. The pastries taste exactly the same. We did side by side tastings, noone could tell the difference. Amazing. Starbucks you rock.
(now if i could only get that raise so i could buy some pastries.)
Posted by: yeah | January 02, 2007 at 11:39 AM
But how will it affect me?
Posted by: Cinnamon Scone Guy | January 02, 2007 at 12:26 PM
The manager at my local Starbucks let me taste the sample of the new lemon loaf the other day when they received the sample for the partners. I actually think it tasted better.
Posted by: Mia | January 02, 2007 at 02:19 PM
correction:
sbux pastries are not going to be trans fat free, they merely have less than 1 gram of trans fat per serving, which (as per FDA regulations) can be called trans fat free. this was in an email my manager gave me.
pretty sneaky (on the FDA's part, not sbux).
Posted by: CuteBarista! | January 02, 2007 at 02:29 PM
Actually cutebarista, the fda says less than .5 grams can be considered zero...which is fine...with rounding and all.
Posted by: nyc angry barista | January 02, 2007 at 04:57 PM
well, the problem with that idea is say you eat three things like the lemon pound cake with .5 grams of trans fat in them (which isn't required to be listed on the nutrition facts panel, btw). boom. 1.5 grams of trans fat, and you might not even know it. rounding is fine and all, but i don't know that i would want to mess with something that bad for my body. a step in the right direction, to be sure, but it's still bunk.
Posted by: CuteBarista! | January 02, 2007 at 05:52 PM
non fat milk is not 0%, and i'm sure you don't have too many issues with that...
although i think there'd be whole different issues with someone eating 3 lemon loafs, and being horrified that they were eating trans fat... :)
Posted by: barockstar | January 02, 2007 at 08:08 PM
If you are eating three slices of lemon cake a day then you have more to worry about than trans fats.
Posted by: June | January 02, 2007 at 08:46 PM
Does anyone really think that some fat bastard is THAT concerned about the amount of trans fats in a pastry as he/she shoves it in their mouth?
Posted by: Barista Boy | January 03, 2007 at 07:44 AM
I tried one of the scones today...Ew. Tastes waaaay too dry...
Posted by: njbaristachick | January 03, 2007 at 08:15 AM
i was using three lemon loaf as an theoretical example. i have unfortunately eaten three starbucks pastries in one day. this is what happens when you're there for eight hours and bored out of your mind. well, at least that's what happens to me. :|
i don't drink any kind of cow's milk, so percentage of fat is kind of immaterial to me.
at any rate, i've been coached by my manager to pass onto partners in my store that the catchphrase is "zero grams trans fat" and not "trans fat free".
ah, semantics.
i haven't tried anything else, but the butter croissants are like the second coming of christ, they're that good.
Posted by: CuteBarista! | January 03, 2007 at 12:28 PM
Barista Boy, it seems a little short sighted to assume that only overweight people eat the pastries, or to assume that if someone is overweight they don't have a reason to be concerned about something like trans fat. Not to mention insensitive, especially in the manner with which you expressed yourself-customers read this site too. Way to represent us in a positive light.
Posted by: Seattle | January 05, 2007 at 05:37 PM
I enjoy Starbucks mochas, however I have tried some of their pastries and found that most of them are either dry, have no taste, or both. I do enjoy the snickerdoodles the best. I have yet to try their breakfast or lunch sandwiches.
Posted by: Bill | January 06, 2007 at 05:01 PM
This blog sucks.
Posted by: BC | January 18, 2007 at 08:10 AM
The FDA dosen't care about any american.They are under the controll of the drug ind. Anytime a food says spices that is one of a long list of cimicals that are hidden under that word.Even MSG. They make the coffee with pure water or city water contianing the poison fluoride.From the phosphate fertlizer ind. that also contians LEAD,ARESNIC,and CHROMIUM.You trust the government FDA what a joke. [ YOU ARE WHAT YOU EAT.] Google [ Paul Connett PhD ] For what it is worth this is a good move.
Posted by: Oscar | January 19, 2007 at 11:58 AM
Why are Starbuck's pastries so awful?
Posted by: mediapusher | October 25, 2007 at 04:18 AM
If I take opportunity for pastries and bakeries, I am sure good command
Posted by: ariadherick | December 08, 2007 at 03:20 AM
The pastries at my local Starbucks look really weird anymore. They all have that large, crystallized sugar on the top, the muffins are strangely uniform and the "cream cheese" in the Danishes looks strangely smooth and artificial. I think this was a bad move on Starbucks' part. I will be taking my business elsewhere for better pastry. Also, they automatically now are defaulting to 2% milk - it used to be whole, another of my preferences. PC-ness! The whole thing is mad.
Posted by: brandy | March 04, 2008 at 04:08 PM
Sounds like a smart move for fat americans.
Posted by: e cigarettes | February 11, 2010 at 03:36 PM
Everybody and their moms go to Starbucks, try the ma and pa places, they're better.
Posted by: E Cig | February 24, 2010 at 11:09 PM
Starbucks you rock.It's still AWESOME. The pastries taste exactly the same. We did side by side tastings, none could tell the difference..
Posted by: Capital Gold Group | June 30, 2010 at 11:00 PM
I have tried some of their pastries and found that most of them are either dry, have no taste, or both. I do enjoy the snicker doodles the best.
Posted by: Danny DeMichele Photos | July 09, 2010 at 12:42 AM
Pastries are not going to be trans fat free, they merely have less than 1 gram of trans fat per serving, which (as per FDA regulations) can be called trans fat free. this was in an email my manager gave me.
Posted by: Reputation Management | July 13, 2010 at 04:45 AM
Truly,The FDA doesn't care about any American.They are under the control of the drug ind. Anytime a food says spices that is one of a long list of cimicals that are hidden under that word.Even MSG.
Posted by: list building | August 02, 2010 at 04:07 AM
I think this was new change move on Starbucks' part. I will be taking my business elsewhere for better pastry. Also, they automatically now are defaulting to 2% milk - it used to be whole, another of my preferences. PC-ness! The whole thing is mad.
Posted by: sell old cell phones | August 06, 2010 at 01:51 AM
now thats good move i have tasted its good
Posted by: Ambella Vanity | August 16, 2010 at 03:55 AM
trans fats raise levels of so-called "bad" cholesterol, which contributes to heart disease.Many cookies, crackers, snack foods and fried foods have trans fats. The substance also occurs naturally in some animal-based foods, including some dairy products used in Starbucks drinks. Starbucks uses flavored syrups with trans fats as well.
Posted by: Joan Austin | September 10, 2010 at 03:43 AM
I often stop here for an iced coffee after my workouts at the cougar gym. It's smaller than your average Buckie's, but the folks are friendly.
This one time...I was out of milk at home and wanted a bowl of cereal really bad...so I asked if I could buy some skim milk...and they filled up a grande cup but only charged me for a kid's milk. That's class,
Posted by: Tracey Awad | September 11, 2010 at 02:39 AM
Starbuck's its really fantastic. The main part which is simply amazing that noone could tell the difference after this ammendmend....
Posted by: SEO Services | September 12, 2010 at 12:28 AM
The substance also occurs naturally in some animal-based foods, including some dairy products used in Starbucks drinks.
Posted by: San Diego Therapy | September 14, 2010 at 11:15 AM
I think Starbucks doing great job
“The devil has put a penalty on all things we enjoy in life. Either we suffer in health or we suffer in soul or we get fat.”
Posted by: Rome Vacation Package | September 18, 2010 at 04:00 AM
This provision by Starbuck is a very good news for those voracious eaters who can't resist the temptation of eating pastries and other fatty stuff when the see it..and the best part is that they will not find even a small difference in the taste.....
isn't that great?????????
Posted by: Mykalai Kontilai | September 21, 2010 at 08:12 AM
I think this was a bad move on Starbucks' part. I will be taking my business elsewhere for better pastry.
Posted by: Danny DeMichele | September 23, 2010 at 05:38 AM
i like the expression of the article a lot. thanks for sharing. tremendous post.
Posted by: Trinh Brandon | September 25, 2010 at 08:46 AM
It was pretty good. Effective,amazing!it's more suspenseful than scary.But it is good.
Posted by: Trent Jordan | October 05, 2010 at 02:53 AM
t was the Good job done, stuff, so this isn't anything new...
Posted by: Gene Berchem | October 07, 2010 at 01:19 AM
I have tried some of their pastries and found that most of them are either dry, have no taste, or both. I do enjoy the snicker doodles the best....
Posted by: Mykalai Kontilai | October 19, 2010 at 02:21 AM
I enjoy Starbucks mocha, however I have tried some of their pastries and found that most of them are either dry, have no taste, or both...
Posted by: Nightly Business Report | October 26, 2010 at 02:46 AM
Gobs of stuff has trans fats in it. Who here is old enough to remember when margerine was relatively new and was touted as 'better for you than butter'?
Posted by: Tony Cabot | October 28, 2010 at 01:08 AM
"Starbucks baked crap has trans fats? That stuff is in everything!"
Almost EVERY commercial food has transfat in it because then it can sit on a shelf for a week or six without going bad (depending, of course, on packaging and other ingredients).
Posted by: John Callan | November 01, 2010 at 10:59 PM
Well i don't drink any kind of cow's milk, so percentage of fat is kind of immaterial to me.Thanks
Posted by: Ged Collins | November 12, 2010 at 01:26 AM
I think this was a bad move on Starbucks' part. I will be taking my business elsewhere for better pastry.Thanks
Posted by: Watch | November 29, 2010 at 05:37 AM
I find myself coming to your blog more and more often to the point where my visits are almost daily now!
Posted by: fatburnbsu | December 09, 2010 at 05:59 AM
Pastries are not going to be trans fat free, they merely have less than 1 gram of trans fat per serving, which can be called trans fat free.
Posted by: Home Protect Home Warranty | December 23, 2010 at 12:36 AM
Starbucks has been quietly swapping out other items containing trans fat in Chicago and other cities.
Posted by: Cross Country Home Services | December 23, 2010 at 10:17 AM
I enjoy Starbucks mochas, however I once tried some of their pastries and found that most of them were dry. I do enjoy the snicker doodles the best. I have yet to try their breakfast or lunch sandwiches.
Posted by: Amy Laurent | December 27, 2010 at 02:23 AM
I tried one of the pastry today...Ew. Tastes way but too dry...
Posted by: Dodge Avenger parts | January 02, 2011 at 12:59 AM
I do enjoy the snickerdoodles the best. I have yet to try their breakfast or lunch sandwiches.
Posted by: Trent Jordan Vancouver | January 21, 2011 at 12:48 AM