« Weekend OPEN THREAD: Discuss *anything* about Starbucks | Main | Starbucks customers can now use the iPhone payment app at 1,000 Target stores »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
not really that insightful, mind blowing or even good journalism
Posted by: lameness | March 30, 2010 at 08:10 PM
^Ditto. It almost looks as if the author of that article read the first and last paragraph the the SBUX Wikipedia article...
Posted by: baristamclane | March 30, 2010 at 08:54 PM
"At close inspection, the Starbucks logo makes no sense. At closer inspection, it makes even less sense, plus you risk dipping your nose in frap foam."
It must be obvious day at camp stupid.
Posted by: Darth Sidamo | March 30, 2010 at 08:59 PM
Considering starbucks bought it's beans from peets when it first opened, and Alfred taught Jerry Baldwin and Jim Reynolds how to roast, I would say #10 is the other way around. Without peets there would be no bux. Conversely, without the bux, peets would not be what it is today... But it is commonly misreported that starbucks at one Point owned peets- jerry did acquire the company back when Sal buonavita sold it off, but he it was completely independent of sbux. While he held controlling interests in both companies, he ultimately ditched the bux to return to peets and then took it public. When Mr. Peet passed away in 2007, even Howard recognized starbucks wouldn't exist without peets. So the peets, I am you father quote is partially inaccurate.
Posted by: Beejers | March 30, 2010 at 09:12 PM
I think any barista that works for Starbucks could list 10 much more interesting things than that article did. How about this...
Many people think that latte drinks with extra shots will give them an extra big caffeine kick. Wrong. A shot of espresso is only 75mg of caffeine. A triple-venti latte has less caffeine than a tall cup of coffee. You would have to drink a latte with almost SIX shots to come close to the caffeine in a venti coffee. A venti "black-eye" is about equal to 8 shots of espresso... like popping 3 No-Doze.
Posted by: Caffeine | March 31, 2010 at 12:11 PM
Re: List of 10 things ...This is the start of a Starbucks trivia game, with cards and board, ... oh it would be so fun! Probably I am the only one silly enough to want to play a Starbucks trivia board game. LOL. I'm game though. ;) Anyone else want to play Starbucks trivia with me?
Posted by: Melody | March 31, 2010 at 01:24 PM
Melody, I don't think this game would be fair. You probably know more about Starbucks than Uncle Howie himself.
;-)
P.S. Did anyone else notice he is not signing his letters with "onward" anymore? Or does he have a new ghost writer who just forgot to add it?
Posted by: me myself and I | March 31, 2010 at 01:47 PM
Okay Melody. Since I know you do not know the answer to the question, What is the correct proportion of French Roast to House Blend in Viennese Blend?
Check annnnd Mate.
Posted by: Darth Sidamo. | March 31, 2010 at 03:11 PM
OK, here's a doosy. The Pike Place market store (aka the Origninal Starbucks) is actually not the orignal. Technically the first store opened about 100 yads down the street, was damaged in a fire and then relocated to what is now the Pike Place store. So we would really need to call it a relocation of the orignal. Now you know.....
Posted by: Starbucks Secrets | April 01, 2010 at 06:28 PM
Yikes I should spell check before I hit post next time, my bad....
Posted by: Starbucks Secrets | April 01, 2010 at 06:31 PM
@ Darth Sidamo
That's a trick question there is no French Roast in Viennese Blend. (At least I hope you posed it as a trick question) The correct proportion is 80% Italian and 20% House
Posted by: Starbucks Secrets | April 01, 2010 at 06:42 PM
This is a great thread, i hope it continues on!!
was Viennese previously offered as a bag?
Posted by: shift misto | April 07, 2010 at 04:53 PM
Starbucks did indeed sell a paper version of Slate. It was a joint venture between Starbucks and Microsoft. Microsoft owned it, Starbucks sold it. This was before Joe magazine. 1996 or 97. It didn't last long, but it's a true story.
Posted by: Long Time Partner | April 09, 2010 at 09:25 PM
@Melody 75% House to 25% French Roast. Not a trick question.
Posted by: Doug | October 21, 2010 at 09:09 AM