Starbucks Gossip
The #1 Starbucks website (not run by Starbucks Corp.)
Home
June 23, 2013
No smoking on the Starbucks patio? Screw that!
A Starbucks gossip reader took this shot at a Kentucky Starbucks. Yes, that's a barista (on the right) with a cigarette near the NO SMOKING sign.
Jun 23, 2013 12:17:49 PM
NEXT POST
Prices of some Starbucks drinks are going up on Tuesday (despite lower bean costs)
Prices on some Starbucks drinks are going up June 25 - next Tuesday. In some markets, the price of a tall brewed coffee will go up a dime. A spokesperson for the coffee chain says that "less than a third...
PREVIOUS POST
Starbucks isn't a daycare center
* Why some parents shouldn't be allowed in Starbucks (and other cafes)
Jim Romenesko
Not affiliated with Starbucks Corporation (obviously)
1
Following
154
Followers
Search
Recent Comments
Angel Elizondo:
Okay this is coming from a barista, in order to...
|
more »
On
"Latte art" heats up in home kitchens, but Starbucks isn't teaching it
Sheila Popish:
ok, had to start over..have a new computer that...
|
more »
On
Frappuccino gripe: "Why would Starbucks 'fix' something that's not broken?"
Sheila Popish:
The frappuccinos are okay. Sure, they taste go...
|
more »
On
Frappuccino gripe: "Why would Starbucks 'fix' something that's not broken?"
Stop crying wolf without a lot more information. Who owns and/or controls the space under their feet?
Clearly, local law would override Starbucks decrees from on high.
In Florida, many stores don't have no smoking signs since the state constitution prohibits it. Maybe in Kentucky, it is at the store's discretion and the signs are for inside the store.
Posted by: Herman | June 23, 2013 at 06:51 PM
Proof that Starbucks did this no smoking thing only to gain publicity.
They can say they'll ban shit til the cows come home but it's impossible to enforce it...
Posted by: Sheik | June 23, 2013 at 08:40 PM
Let's stop focusing on the poor baristas, instead, let's focus on the district managers and area managers who regularly smoke outside of my store within 5 feet of the door entrance. There's your story! Leave the hourly employees alone. For Christ sakes!
Posted by: Bob | June 24, 2013 at 01:17 AM
That's the essence of every experience I've ever had in Kentucky.
Posted by: Crateish | June 24, 2013 at 07:13 AM
we just ask people to step out into the parking lot to smoke and then they can come right back to enjoy their drink and hang out. it has been SO NICE not to have to pick up a million cigarette butts every day! we picked up butts twice a day every day and still got a point knocked off when qasa came around because they look for that specifically. our patio looks so much classier without the butts and ash trays. :)
Posted by: just another partner | June 24, 2013 at 07:31 AM
They are still smoking right outside the door at my local Starbucks in Central PA. Customers are...I haven't seen any workers do it.
Posted by: Coffeelvr | June 25, 2013 at 08:15 AM
After thirteen years of spending roughly $10 per day at Starbucks my husband and I are done! Non smokers have the entire interior world, you can't give me a corner of the patio so I can enjoy my coffee and book with a smoke?
The final straw, however, was that they refused to refund the $100 I has put on my card the day before the announcrment! Screw you Starbucks! You are NOT the only coffee shop out there.
Posted by: Regina | June 30, 2013 at 04:14 PM
^ LOL why do people load obscene amounts of money onto their starbucks card at once?
Posted by: beyonce | June 30, 2013 at 07:16 PM
$100 "obscene"? Obviously you haven't checked Starbucks prices lately! It used to go shockingly fast. That's ok. I'm saving that money now.
Posted by: Regina | July 01, 2013 at 10:54 AM
I wouldn't have refunded it either. The money on the card is for drinks, not for the cigarettes you won't be able to smoke on their property.
Posted by: Sean | July 02, 2013 at 09:27 PM
I USED to spend about $600-$700 annually on Starbucks until this ban.
Starbucks has their choice, good for you implementing a no-smoking rule!
I, However, have my choices as well. No more $600-700 annually just from me alone. I have $3.00 left in my Gold Card available and when that's done (which is less than 1 drink), I'm outta there.
Posted by: Bob O. | July 07, 2013 at 11:40 AM
If I can buy cigarettes legally and pay tax why I can not smoke my cigarette? If they are harmful for people why Government not prohibits selling the cigarettes? According to some studies the coffee is harmful for people health, too. If Starbucks care about customers health why they selling coffee, anyway? What a double standard and hypocrisy! Characteristic for plastic brainwashed Liberals. Maybe we poor primitives deserve this humiliation ... but we still have a power
Posted by: RoccoS | October 12, 2013 at 07:38 PM
Thrilled that Starbucks bans smoking; they will surely get more business that way, even discounting the whiny smokers who feel its their right to pollute their lungs and everyone else's too.
Posted by: Traci | October 14, 2013 at 12:49 PM
I find this new policy quite irritating. I have two cigarettes per day, one of which I enjoy while drinking my coffee. I guess I will be buying it elsewhere.
Posted by: william | October 17, 2013 at 09:00 AM